Posts Tagged ‘prohibition’

A taste for temperance: How American beer got to be so bland

25 June 2015

This new article of mine in Business History has nothing to do with the economic and financial crisis, but it’s gotten more press than any previous article I’d written, so I thought I’d post a link here.

The link will take you to the abstract and the first page only. If you would prefer to read the full, 31-page version, then here is the deluxe link. (If for some reason it does not work, you can email me — ranjit dot dighe at oswego dot edu.)

The article in brief: This article examines the historical origins of bland American beer. The US was not strongly associated with a particular beer type until German immigrants popularized lager beer. Lager, refreshing and mildly intoxicating, met the demands of America’s growing working class. Over time, American lager became lighter and blander. By the 1880s, there was a distinct “American adjunct lager” that used rice or corn to minimize the bitterness and heartiness of the malt and hops. For the next century it would get blander still and would extend its dominance of the beer market. Why? This article emphasizes America’s uncommonly strong temperance movement, which put the industry on the defensive. Another factor was the American labor market in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with long hours (and meals often consumed at saloons between shifts), negligible union protections, and a substantial “reserve army of unemployed” from which a tipsy worker could easily be replaced. Even before Prohibition, pale pilsners were some 85-90% of the market. (And yes, Prohibition was really bad for hearty beers.) Brewers consistently pushed their product as “the beverage of moderation,” and consumers increasingly sought out light, relatively non-intoxicating beers. The recent “craft beer revolution” is explained as a backlash aided by a changing consumer culture and improved information technology. The paper’s derives its conclusions from data on beer styles, production, and content (alcohol, hops, and malt), as well as articles and editorials in trade publications.


Legalize It — The Economic Argument

30 January 2014

I wrote this one for The Huffington Post, so I will send you there.

The essence of the argument is that the expected benefits of legalization far exceed the expected costs, so it’s worth doing. The benefits and costs have little do with what people normally think of as economic factors, like tax revenues and law enforcement expenditures, which are actually quite small. What matters much more is the human cost of arresting, imprisoning, and/or seizing the assets of thousands of people and putting some 20 – 30 million more of them at risk of similar punishment for their recreational behavior.

Happy repeal day!

4 December 2009

MenckenDecember 5 is the 75th birthday of the 21st Amendment, which ended the ghastly experiment known as Prohibition.   I’ll drink to that.

Happy repeal day!

5 December 2008

Today is the 75th birthday of the 21st Amendment.   I’ll drink to that.